↓ Skip to main content

Before it is too late: professional responsibilities in late-onset Alzheimer’s research and pre-symptomatic prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Before it is too late: professional responsibilities in late-onset Alzheimer’s research and pre-symptomatic prediction
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00921
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silke Schicktanz, Mark Schweda, Jesse F. Ballenger, Patrick J. Fox, Jodi Halpern, Joel H. Kramer, Guy Micco, Stephen G. Post, Charis Thompson, Robert T. Knight, William J. Jagust

Abstract

The development of a wide array of molecular and neuroscientific biomarkers can provide the possibility to visualize the course of Alzheimer's disease (AD) at early stages. Many of these biomarkers are aimed at detecting not only a preclinical, but also a pre-symptomatic state. They are supposed to facilitate clinical trials aiming at treatments that attack the disease at its earliest stage or even prevent it. The increasing number of such biomarkers currently tested and now partly proposed for clinical implementation calls for critical reflection on their aims, social benefits, and risks. This position paper summarizes major challenges and responsibilities. Its focus is on the ethical and social problems involved in the organization and application of dementia research, as well as in healthcare provision from a cross-national point of view. The paper is based on a discussion of leading dementia experts from neuroscience, neurology, social sciences, and bioethics in the United States and Europe. It thus reflects a notable consensus across various disciplines and national backgrounds. We intend to initiate a debate on the need for actions within the researchers' national and international communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Other 18 30%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,790,240
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,909
of 7,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,117
of 362,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#148
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.