↓ Skip to main content

Finding the answer in space: the mental whiteboard hypothesis on serial order in working memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Finding the answer in space: the mental whiteboard hypothesis on serial order in working memory
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00932
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elger Abrahamse, Jean-Philippe van Dijck, Steve Majerus, Wim Fias

Abstract

Various prominent models on serial order coding in working memory (WM) build on the notion that serial order is achieved by binding the various items to-be-maintained to fixed position markers. Despite being relatively successful in accounting for empirical observations and some recent neuro-imaging support, these models were largely formulated on theoretical grounds and few specifications have been provided with respect to the cognitive and/or neural nature of these position markers. Here we outline a hypothesis on a novel candidate mechanism to substantiate the notion of serial position markers. Specifically, we propose that serial order WM is grounded in the spatial attention system: (I) The position markers that provide multi-item WM with a serial context should be understood as coordinates within an internal, spatially defined system; (II) internal spatial attention is involved in searching through the resulting serial order representation; and (III) retrieval corresponds to selection by spatial attention. We sketch the available empirical support and discuss how the hypothesis may provide a parsimonious framework from which to understand a broad range of observations across behavioral, neural and neuropsychological domains. Finally, we pinpoint what we believe are major questions for future research inspired by the hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Professor 7 7%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 49%
Neuroscience 11 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Linguistics 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,932,103
of 23,868,920 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,949
of 7,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,494
of 368,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#126
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,920 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.