You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Schizophrenia and cortical blindness: protective effects and implications for language
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00940 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Evelina Leivada, Cedric Boeckx |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 16 | 17% |
United States | 8 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
Ireland | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Congo | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
Turkey | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 51 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 81 | 87% |
Scientists | 7 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Professor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 16 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 11 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#471,149
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#201
of 7,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,457
of 371,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#8
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.