↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of an impairment-based individualized rehabilitation program using an iPad-based software platform

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
34 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of an impairment-based individualized rehabilitation program using an iPad-based software platform
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carrie A. Des Roches, Isabel Balachandran, Elsa M. Ascenso, Yorghos Tripodis, Swathi Kiran

Abstract

The delivery of tablet-based rehabilitation for individuals with post-stroke aphasia is relatively new, therefore, this study examined the effectiveness of an iPad-based therapy to demonstrate improvement in specific therapy tasks and how the tasks affect overall language and cognitive skills. Fifty-one individuals with aphasia due to a stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) were recruited to use an iPad-based software platform, Constant Therapy, for a 10 week therapy program. Participants were split into an experimental (N = 42) and control (N = 9) group. Both experimental and control participants received a 1 h clinic session with a clinician once a week, the experimental participants additionally practiced the therapy at home. Participants did not differ in the duration of the therapy and both groups of participants showed improvement over time in the tasks used for the therapy. However, experimental participants used the application more often and showed greater changes in accuracy and latency on the tasks than the control participants; experimental participants' severity level at baseline as measured by standardized tests of language and cognitive skills were a factor in improvement on the tasks. Subgroups of task co-improvement appear to occur between different language tasks, between different cognitive tasks, and across both domains. Finally, experimental participants showed more significant and positive changes due to therapy in their standardized tests than control participants. These results provide preliminary evidence for the usefulness of a tablet-based platform to deliver tailored language and cognitive therapy to individuals with aphasia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Unknown 229 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 19%
Student > Master 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 49 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Neuroscience 16 7%
Linguistics 12 5%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 68 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#277,374
of 24,569,575 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#134
of 7,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,358
of 362,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,569,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.