↓ Skip to main content

The neural substrates of natural reading: a comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The neural substrates of natural reading: a comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wonil Choi, Rutvik H. Desai, John M. Henderson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 92 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor 9 9%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 34%
Neuroscience 17 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Linguistics 6 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,000,365
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#445
of 7,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,685
of 365,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#12
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.