↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
950 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua E. Aman, Naveen Elangovan, I-Ling Yeh, Jürgen Konczak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 950 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 944 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 154 16%
Student > Master 152 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 10%
Researcher 66 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 6%
Other 160 17%
Unknown 269 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 139 15%
Sports and Recreations 100 11%
Neuroscience 83 9%
Engineering 63 7%
Other 123 13%
Unknown 297 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,589,838
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#730
of 7,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,470
of 363,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#22
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.