You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A framework for categorizing electrode montages in transcranial direct current stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Padideh Nasseri, Michael A. Nitsche, Hamed Ekhtiari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 62 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 47 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 66 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,035,636
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,460
of 7,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,400
of 352,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#74
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.