You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analyzing the association between functional connectivity of the brain and intellectual performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00061 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gustavo S. P. Pamplona, Gérson S. Santos Neto, Sara R. E. Rosset, Baxter P. Rogers, Carlos E. G. Salmon |
| Abstract |
Measurements of functional connectivity support the hypothesis that the brain is composed of distinct networks with anatomically separated nodes but common functionality. A few studies have suggested that intellectual performance may be associated with greater functional connectivity in the fronto-parietal network and enhanced global efficiency. In this fMRI study, we performed an exploratory analysis of the relationship between the brain's functional connectivity and intelligence scores derived from the Portuguese language version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) in a sample of 29 people, born and raised in Brazil. We examined functional connectivity between 82 regions, including graph theoretic properties of the overall network. Some previous findings were extended to the Portuguese-speaking population, specifically the presence of small-world organization of the brain and relationships of intelligence with connectivity of frontal, pre-central, parietal, occipital, fusiform and supramarginal gyrus, and caudate nucleus. Verbal comprehension was associated with global network efficiency, a new finding. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 27 | 27% |
| Psychology | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#14,368,307
of 25,339,932 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,691
of 7,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,179
of 370,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#92
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,339,932 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.