You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sleep Spindles Predict Stress-Related Increases in Sleep Disturbances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00068 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thien Thanh Dang-Vu, Ali Salimi, Soufiane Boucetta, Kerstin Wenzel, Jordan O’Byrne, Marie Brandewinder, Christian Berthomier, Jean-Philippe Gouin |
| Abstract |
Predisposing factors place certain individuals at higher risk for insomnia, especially in the presence of precipitating conditions such as stressful life events. Sleep spindles have been shown to play an important role in the preservation of sleep continuity. Lower spindle density might thus constitute an objective predisposing factor for sleep reactivity to stress. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the relationship between baseline sleep spindle density and the prospective change in insomnia symptoms in response to a standardized academic stressor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 20% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2017.
All research outputs
#423,338
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#193
of 7,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,140
of 357,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.