You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differential cerebral response to somatosensory stimulation of an acupuncture point vs. two non-acupuncture points measured with EEG and fMRI
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00074 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Till Nierhaus, Daniel Pach, Wenjing Huang, Xiangyu Long, Vitaly Napadow, Stephanie Roll, Fanrong Liang, Burkhard Pleger, Arno Villringer, Claudia M. Witt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
Germany | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 16% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 24% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Psychology | 4 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,283,096
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,644
of 7,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,371
of 358,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#64
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.