You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The lemon illusion: seeing curvature where there is none
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00095 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lars Strother, Kyle W. Killebrew, Gideon P. Caplovitz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 22% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 59% |
| Scientists | 8 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 33% |
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 58% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,979,802
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#918
of 7,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,331
of 269,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#40
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.