You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling violations of the race model inequality in bimodal paradigms: co-activation from decision and non-decision components
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Zehetleitner, Emil Ratko-Dehnert, Hermann J. Müller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,680,386
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,839
of 7,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,198
of 258,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#122
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.