↓ Skip to main content

A computerized tablet with visual feedback of hand position for functional magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A computerized tablet with visual feedback of hand position for functional magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahta Karimpoor, Fred Tam, Stephen C. Strother, Corinne E. Fischer, Tom A. Schweizer, Simon J. Graham

Abstract

Neuropsychological tests behavioral tasks that very commonly involve handwriting and drawing are widely used in the clinic to detect abnormal brain function. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may be useful in increasing the specificity of such tests. However, performing complex pen-and-paper tests during fMRI involves engineering challenges. Previously, we developed an fMRI-compatible, computerized tablet system to address this issue. However, the tablet did not include visual feedback of hand position (VFHP), a human factors component that may be important for fMRI of certain patient populations. A real-time system was thus developed to provide VFHP and integrated with the tablet in an augmented reality display. The effectiveness of the system was initially tested in young healthy adults who performed various handwriting tasks in front of a computer display with and without VFHP. Pilot fMRI of writing tasks were performed by two representative individuals with and without VFHP. Quantitative analysis of the behavioral results indicated improved writing performance with VFHP. The pilot fMRI results suggest that writing with VFHP requires less neural resources compared to the without VFHP condition, to maintain similar behavior. Thus, the tablet system with VFHP is recommended for future fMRI studies involving patients with impaired brain function and where ecologically valid behavior is important.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Psychology 8 13%
Neuroscience 7 11%
Engineering 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,749,774
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,703
of 7,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,061
of 263,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#152
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.