↓ Skip to main content

Error-related potentials during continuous feedback: using EEG to detect errors of different type and severity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Error-related potentials during continuous feedback: using EEG to detect errors of different type and severity
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Spüler, Christian Niethammer

Abstract

When a person recognizes an error during a task, an error-related potential (ErrP) can be measured as response. It has been shown that ErrPs can be automatically detected in tasks with time-discrete feedback, which is widely applied in the field of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) for error correction or adaptation. However, there are only a few studies that concentrate on ErrPs during continuous feedback. With this study, we wanted to answer three different questions: (i) Can ErrPs be measured in electroencephalography (EEG) recordings during a task with continuous cursor control? (ii) Can ErrPs be classified using machine learning methods and is it possible to discriminate errors of different origins? (iii) Can we use EEG to detect the severity of an error? To answer these questions, we recorded EEG data from 10 subjects during a video game task and investigated two different types of error (execution error, due to inaccurate feedback; outcome error, due to not achieving the goal of an action). We analyzed the recorded data to show that during the same task, different kinds of error produce different ErrP waveforms and have a different spectral response. This allows us to detect and discriminate errors of different origin in an event-locked manner. By utilizing the error-related spectral response, we show that also a continuous, asynchronous detection of errors is possible. Although the detection of error severity based on EEG was one goal of this study, we did not find any significant influence of the severity on the EEG.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 235 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 24%
Student > Master 54 22%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 45 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 63 26%
Neuroscience 35 14%
Computer Science 34 14%
Psychology 33 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 53 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,963,252
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#908
of 7,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,802
of 277,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#47
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.