↓ Skip to main content

The preparatory set: a novel approach to understanding stress, trauma, and the bodymind therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The preparatory set: a novel approach to understanding stress, trauma, and the bodymind therapies
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Payne, Mardi A. Crane-Godreau

Abstract

Basic to all motile life is a differential approach/avoid response to perceived features of environment. The stages of response are initial reflexive noticing and orienting to the stimulus, preparation, and execution of response. Preparation involves a coordination of many aspects of the organism: muscle tone, posture, breathing, autonomic functions, motivational/emotional state, attentional orientation, and expectations. The organism organizes itself in relation to the challenge. We propose to call this the "preparatory set" (PS). We suggest that the concept of the PS can offer a more nuanced and flexible perspective on the stress response than do current theories. We also hypothesize that the mechanisms of body-mind therapeutic and educational systems (BTES) can be understood through the PS framework. We suggest that the BTES, including meditative movement, meditation, somatic education, and the body-oriented psychotherapies, are approaches that use interventions on the PS to remedy stress and trauma. We discuss how the PS can be adaptive or maladaptive, how BTES interventions may restore adaptive PS, and how these concepts offer a broader and more flexible view of the phenomena of stress and trauma. We offer supportive evidence for our hypotheses, and suggest directions for future research. We believe that the PS framework will point to ways of improving the management of stress and trauma, and that it will suggest directions of research into the mechanisms of action of BTES.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 237 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 23%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 68 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 71 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,696,193
of 23,983,331 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#813
of 7,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,504
of 267,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#44
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.