Title |
Objective differentiation of neonatal EEG background grades using detrended fluctuation analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00189 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vladimir Matic, Perumpillichira Joseph Cherian, Ninah Koolen, Amir H. Ansari, Gunnar Naulaers, Paul Govaert, Sabine Van Huffel, Maarten De Vos, Sampsa Vanhatalo |
Abstract |
A quantitative and objective assessment of background electroencephalograph (EEG) in sick neonates remains an everyday clinical challenge. We studied whether long range temporal correlations quantified by detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) could be used in the neonatal EEG to distinguish different grades of abnormality in the background EEG activity. Long-term EEG records of 34 neonates were collected after perinatal asphyxia, and their background was scored in 1 h epochs (8 h in each neonate) as mild, moderate or severe. We applied DFA on 15 min long, non-overlapping EEG epochs (n = 1088) filtered from 3 to 8 Hz. Our formal feasibility study suggested that DFA exponent can be reliably assessed in only part of the EEG epochs, and in only relatively short time scales (10-60 s), while it becomes ambiguous if longer time scales are considered. This prompted further exploration whether paradigm used for quantifying multifractal DFA (MF-DFA) could be applied in a more efficient way, and whether metrics from MF-DFA paradigm could yield useful benchmark with existing clinical EEG gradings. Comparison of MF-DFA metrics showed a significant difference between three visually assessed background EEG grades. MF-DFA parameters were also significantly correlated to interburst intervals quantified with our previously developed automated detector. Finally, we piloted a monitoring application of MF-DFA metrics and showed their evolution during patient recovery from asphyxia. Our exploratory study showed that neonatal EEG can be quantified using multifractal metrics, which might offer a suitable parameter to quantify the grade of EEG background, or to monitor changes in brain state that take place during long-term brain monitoring. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 25% |
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 25% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 12 | 25% |
Engineering | 9 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |