↓ Skip to main content

The embodied brain: towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
94 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
391 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The embodied brain: towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Kiverstein, Mark Miller

Abstract

In this programmatic paper we explain why a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience is needed. We argue for such a claim based on problems that have arisen in cognitive neuroscience for the project of localizing function to specific brain structures. The problems come from research concerned with functional and structural connectivity that strongly suggests that the function a brain region serves is dynamic, and changes over time. We argue that in order to determine the function of a specific brain area, neuroscientists need to zoom out and look at the larger organism-environment system. We therefore argue that instead of looking to cognitive psychology for an analysis of psychological functions, cognitive neuroscience should look to an ecological dynamical psychology. A second aim of our paper is to develop an account of embodied cognition based on the inseparability of cognitive and emotional processing in the brain. We argue that emotions are best understood in terms of action readiness (Frijda, 1986, 2007) in the context of the organism's ongoing skillful engagement with the environment (Rietveld, 2008; Bruineberg and Rietveld, 2014; Kiverstein and Rietveld, 2015, forthcoming). States of action readiness involve the whole living body of the organism, and are elicited by possibilities for action in the environment that matter to the organism. Since emotion and cognition are inseparable processes in the brain it follows that what is true of emotion is also true of cognition. Cognitive processes are likewise processes taking place in the whole living body of an organism as it engages with relevant possibilities for action.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 4 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 366 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 17%
Researcher 64 16%
Student > Master 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Other 90 23%
Unknown 55 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 103 26%
Neuroscience 47 12%
Philosophy 39 10%
Social Sciences 29 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Other 89 23%
Unknown 67 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#409,368
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#170
of 7,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,400
of 279,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#7
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.