↓ Skip to main content

A Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Consideration of Mindful Movement: Clinical and Research Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
facebook
24 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Consideration of Mindful Movement: Clinical and Research Implications
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Anne Russell, Silvia Maria Arcuri

Abstract

In this article, we present ideas related to three key aspects of mindfulness training: the regulation of attention via noradrenaline, the importance of working memory and its various components (particularly the central executive and episodic buffer), and the relationship of both of these to mind-wandering. These same aspects of mindfulness training are also involved in the preparation and execution of movement and implicated in the pathophysiology of psychosis. We argue that by moving in a mindful way, there may be an additive effect of training as the two elements of the practice (mindfulness and movement) independently, and perhaps synergistically, engage common underlying systems (the default mode network). We discuss how working with mindful movement may be one route to mindfulness training for individuals who would struggle to sit still to complete the more commonly taught mindfulness practices. Drawing on our clinical experience working with individuals with severe and enduring mental health conditions, we show the real world application of these ideas and how they can be used to help those who are suffering and for whom current treatments are still far from adequate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 202 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 53 25%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Neuroscience 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 44 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,028,953
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#476
of 7,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,358
of 268,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#16
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.