You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Boundaries and potentials of traditional and alternative neuroscience research methods in music therapy research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea M. Hunt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 45% |
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Greece | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 26% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 13 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2015.
All research outputs
#1,428,444
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#647
of 7,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,383
of 282,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#23
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.