You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dreaming and Neuroesthetics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00348 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Umberto Barcaro, Marco Paoli |
| Abstract |
This paper, which is limited to the art of painting, aims to support the idea that a substantial insertion of concepts and methods drawn on dream psychology and dream neuroscience can contribute to the advancements of Neuroesthetics. The historical and scientific reasons are discussed that have determined the so far poor role played by the dream phenomenon in the developments of Neuroesthetics. In the light of recent advancements in psychophysiological research, a method of analyzing artistic products is proposed that is based on the recognition of precise features proper of the dreaming experience. Four examples are given for application of this method, regarding works by Giorgione, Leonardo da Vinci, Vermeer, and Millais, respectively. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Chile | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,761,024
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#829
of 7,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,483
of 269,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#25
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.