↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiology of ADHD and associated problems—starting points for NF interventions?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathophysiology of ADHD and associated problems—starting points for NF interventions?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00359
Pubmed ID
Authors

Björn Albrecht, Henrik Uebel-von Sandersleben, Holger Gevensleben, Aribert Rothenberger

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by severe and age-inappropriate levels of hyperactivity, impulsivity and inattention. ADHD is a heterogeneous disorder, and the majority of patients show comorbid or associated problems from other psychiatric disorders. Also, ADHD is associated with cognitive and motivational problems as well as resting-state abnormalities, associated with impaired brain activity in distinct neuronal networks. This needs to be considered in a multimodal treatment, of which neurofeedback (NF) may be a promising component. During NF, specific brain activity is fed-back using visual or auditory signals, allowing the participants to gain control over these otherwise unaware neuronal processes. NF may be used to directly improve underlying neuronal deficits, and/or to establish more general self-regulatory skills that may be used to compensate behavioral difficulties. The current manuscript describes pathophysiological characteristics of ADHD, heterogeneity of ADHD subtypes and gender differences, as well as frequently associated behavioral problems such as oppositional defiant/conduct or tic disorder. It is discussed how NF may be helpful as a treatment approach within these contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 267 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 19%
Student > Master 45 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Researcher 15 6%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 78 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Neuroscience 14 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 91 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,633,646
of 25,552,205 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,232
of 7,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,287
of 278,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#30
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.