↓ Skip to main content

Crossmodal deficit in dyslexic children: practice affects the neural timing of letter-speech sound integration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Crossmodal deficit in dyslexic children: practice affects the neural timing of letter-speech sound integration
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gojko Žarić, Gorka Fraga González, Jurgen Tijms, Maurits W. van der Molen, Leo Blomert, Milene Bonte

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 37%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,329,122
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,885
of 7,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,916
of 281,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#39
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.