↓ Skip to main content

Beauty and the beholder: the role of visual sensitivity in visual preference

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beauty and the beholder: the role of visual sensitivity in visual preference
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00514
Pubmed ID
Authors

Branka Spehar, Solomon Wong, Sarah van de Klundert, Jessie Lui, Colin W. G. Clifford, Richard P. Taylor

Abstract

For centuries, the essence of aesthetic experience has remained one of the most intriguing mysteries for philosophers, artists, art historians and scientists alike. Recently, views emphasizing the link between aesthetics, perception and brain function have become increasingly prevalent (Ramachandran and Hirstein, 1999; Zeki, 1999; Livingstone, 2002; Ishizu and Zeki, 2013). The link between art and the fractal-like structure of natural images has also been highlighted (Spehar et al., 2003; Graham and Field, 2007; Graham and Redies, 2010). Motivated by these claims and our previous findings that humans display a consistent preference across various images with fractal-like statistics, here we explore the possibility that observers' preference for visual patterns might be related to their sensitivity for such patterns. We measure sensitivity to simple visual patterns (sine-wave gratings varying in spatial frequency and random textures with varying scaling exponent) and find that they are highly correlated with visual preferences exhibited by the same observers. Although we do not attempt to offer a comprehensive neural model of aesthetic experience, we demonstrate a strong relationship between visual sensitivity and preference for simple visual patterns. Broadly speaking, our results support assertions that there is a close relationship between aesthetic experience and the sensory coding of natural stimuli.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 23%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 12 11%
Researcher 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 33%
Neuroscience 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Design 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,293,238
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,541
of 7,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,655
of 274,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#131
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.