↓ Skip to main content

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Neuronal Activity and Learning in Pilot Training

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 7,752)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
106 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Neuronal Activity and Learning in Pilot Training
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaehoon Choe, Brian A. Coffman, Dylan T. Bergstedt, Matthias D. Ziegler, Matthew E. Phillips

Abstract

Skill acquisition requires distributed learning both within (online) and across (offline) days to consolidate experiences into newly learned abilities. In particular, piloting an aircraft requires skills developed from extensive training and practice. Here, we tested the hypothesis that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modulate neuronal function to improve skill learning and performance during flight simulator training of aircraft landing procedures. Thirty-two right-handed participants consented to participate in four consecutive daily sessions of flight simulation training and received sham or anodal high-definition-tDCS to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or left motor cortex (M1) in a randomized, double-blind experiment. Continuous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) were collected during flight simulation, n-back working memory, and resting-state assessments. tDCS of the right DLPFC increased midline-frontal theta-band activity in flight and n-back working memory training, confirming tDCS-related modulation of brain processes involved in executive function. This modulation corresponded to a significantly different online and offline learning rates for working memory accuracy and decreased inter-subject behavioral variability in flight and n-back tasks in the DLPFC stimulation group. Additionally, tDCS of left M1 increased parietal alpha power during flight tasks and tDCS to the right DLPFC increased midline frontal theta-band power during n-back and flight tasks. These results demonstrate a modulation of group variance in skill acquisition through an increasing in learned skill consistency in cognitive and real-world tasks with tDCS. Further, tDCS performance improvements corresponded to changes in electrophysiological and blood-oxygenation activity of the DLPFC and motor cortices, providing a stronger link between modulated neuronal function and behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 316 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 19%
Student > Master 57 17%
Researcher 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 63 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 19%
Neuroscience 58 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 10%
Engineering 23 7%
Computer Science 15 5%
Other 61 19%
Unknown 77 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 509. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#51,174
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#33
of 7,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#844
of 411,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.