↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Post-Concussion Neurocognitive Deficits. I. Relationship with White Matter Integrity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic Post-Concussion Neurocognitive Deficits. I. Relationship with White Matter Integrity
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Maruta, Eva M. Palacios, Robert D. Zimmerman, Jamshid Ghajar, Pratik Mukherjee

Abstract

We previously identified visual tracking deficits and associated degradation of integrity in specific white matter tracts as characteristics of concussion. We re-explored these characteristics in adult patients with persistent post-concussive symptoms using independent new data acquired during 2009-2012. Thirty-two patients and 126 normal controls underwent cognitive assessments and MR-DTI. After data collection, a subset of control subjects was selected to be individually paired with patients based on gender and age. We identified patients' cognitive deficits through pairwise comparisons between patients and matched control subjects. Within the remaining 94 normal subjects, we identified white matter tracts whose integrity correlated with metrics that indicated performance degradation in patients. We then tested for reduced integrity in these white matter tracts in patients relative to matched controls. Most patients showed no abnormality in MR images unlike the previous study. Patients' visual tracking was generally normal. Patients' response times in an attention task were slowed, but could not be explained as reduced integrity of white matter tracts relating to normal response timing. In the present patient cohort, we did not observe behavioral or anatomical deficits that we previously identified as characteristic of concussion. The recent cohort likely represented those with milder injury compared to the earlier cohort. The discrepancy may be explained by a change in the patient recruitment pool circa 2007 associated with an increase in public awareness of concussion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 12 9%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Psychology 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,671,301
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,126
of 7,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,094
of 400,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#45
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.