You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Relationship between Frontotemporal Effective Connectivity during Picture Naming, Behavior, and Preserved Cortical Tissue in Chronic Aphasia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erin L. Meier, Kushal J. Kapse, Swathi Kiran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,219,424
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,756
of 7,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,434
of 317,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#57
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.