You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Foreign Accent Syndrome As a Psychogenic Disorder: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00168 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefanie Keulen, Jo Verhoeven, Elke De Witte, Louis De Page, Roelien Bastiaanse, Peter Mariën |
| Abstract |
In the majority of cases published between 1907 and 2014, FAS is due to a neurogenic etiology. Only a few reports about FAS with an assumed psychogenic origin have been published. The present article discusses the findings of a careful database search on psychogenic FAS. This review may be particularly relevant as it is the first to analyze the salient features of psychogenic FAS cases to date. This article hopes to pave the way for the view that psychogenic FAS is a cognate of neurogenic FAS. It is felt that this variant of FAS may have been underreported, as most of the psychogenic cases have been published after the turn of the century. This review may improve the diagnosis of the syndrome in clinical practice and highlights the importance of recognizing psychogenic FAS as an independent taxonomic entity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Greece | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 20% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2023.
All research outputs
#236,112
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#104
of 7,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,331
of 312,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.