↓ Skip to main content

Corticostriatal Dysfunction in Huntington’s Disease: The Basics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corticostriatal Dysfunction in Huntington’s Disease: The Basics
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00317
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kendra D. Bunner, George V. Rebec

Abstract

The main input to the basal ganglia, the corticostriatal pathway, shows some of the earliest signs of neuropathology in Huntington's disease (HD), an inherited neurodegenerative condition that typically strikes in mid-life with progressively deteriorating cognitive, emotional, and motor symptoms. Although an effective treatment remains elusive, research on transgenic animal models has implicated dysregulation of glutamate (Glu), the excitatory amino acid released by corticostriatal neurons, in HD onset. Abnormalities in the control of Glu transmission at the level of postsynaptic receptors and Glu transport proteins play a critical role in the loss of information flow through downstream circuits that set the stage for the HD behavioral phenotype. Parallel but less-well characterized changes in dopamine (DA), a key modulator of Glu activation, ensure further deficits in neuronal communication throughout the basal ganglia. Continued analysis of corticostriatal Glu transmission and its modulation by DA, including analysis at the neurobehavioral level in transgenic models, is likely to be an effective strategy in the pursuit of HD therapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Master 21 14%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 39 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 42 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,336,031
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,548
of 7,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,477
of 351,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#181
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.