↓ Skip to main content

Attachment, Neurobiology, and Mentalizing along the Psychosis Continuum

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attachment, Neurobiology, and Mentalizing along the Psychosis Continuum
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00406
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Debbané, George Salaminios, Patrick Luyten, Deborah Badoud, Marco Armando, Alessandra Solida Tozzi, Peter Fonagy, Benjamin K. Brent

Abstract

In this review article, we outline the evidence linking attachment adversity to psychosis, from the premorbid stages of the disorder to its clinical forms. To better understand the neurobiological mechanisms through which insecure attachment may contribute to psychosis, we identify at least five neurobiological pathways linking attachment to risk for developing psychosis. Besides its well documented influence on the hypothalamic-pituary-adrenal (HPA) axis, insecure attachment may also contribute to neurodevelopmental risk through the dopaminergic and oxytonergic systems, as well as bear influence on neuroinflammation and oxidative stress responses. We further consider the neuroscientific and behavioral studies that underpin mentalization as a suite of processes potentially moderating the risk to transition to psychotic disorders. In particular, mentalization may help the individual compensate for endophenotypical impairments in the integration of sensory and metacognitive information. We propose a model where embodied mentalization would lie at the core of a protective, resilience response mitigating the adverse and potentially pathological influence of the neurodevelopmental cascade of risk for psychosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 290 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Student > Master 42 14%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 61 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 132 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 10%
Neuroscience 25 9%
Unspecified 7 2%
Arts and Humanities 6 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 72 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#13,879,517
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,802
of 7,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,896
of 349,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#64
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.