↓ Skip to main content

Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence among Spanish Teachers and an Exploration of Cross-Cultural Variation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
190 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence among Spanish Teachers and an Exploration of Cross-Cultural Variation
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Ferrero, Pablo Garaizar, Miguel A. Vadillo

Abstract

Enthusiasm for research on the brain and its application in education is growing among teachers. However, a lack of sufficient knowledge, poor communication between educators and scientists, and the effective marketing of dubious educational products has led to the proliferation of numerous 'neuromyths.' As a first step toward designing effective interventions to correct these misconceptions, previous studies have explored the prevalence of neuromyths in different countries. In the present study we extend this applied research by gathering data from a new sample of Spanish teachers and by meta-analyzing all the evidence available so far. Our results show that some of the most popular neuromyths identified in previous studies are also endorsed by Spanish teachers. The meta-analytic synthesis of these data and previous research confirms that the popularity of some neuromyths is remarkably consistent across countries, although we also note peculiarities and exceptions with important implications for the development of effective interventions. In light of the increasing popularity of pseudoscientific practices in schools worldwide, we suggest a set of interventions to address misconceptions about the brain and education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 190 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 13%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 58 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 19%
Social Sciences 30 14%
Neuroscience 25 11%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 70 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#163,254
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#80
of 7,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,162
of 326,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.