↓ Skip to main content

Mediators of Physical Activity on Neurocognitive Function: A Review at Multiple Levels of Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mediators of Physical Activity on Neurocognitive Function: A Review at Multiple Levels of Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00626
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chelsea M. Stillman, Jamie Cohen, Morgan E. Lehman, Kirk I. Erickson

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is known to maintain and improve neurocognitive health. However, there is still a poor understanding of the mechanisms by which PA exerts its effects on the brain and cognition in humans. Many of the most widely discussed mechanisms of PA are molecular and cellular and arise from animal models. While information about basic cellular and molecular mechanisms is an important foundation from which to build our understanding of how PA promotes cognitive health in humans, there are other pathways that could play a role in this relationship. For example, PA-induced changes to cellular and molecular pathways likely initiate changes to macroscopic properties of the brain and/or to behavior that in turn influence cognition. The present review uses a more macroscopic lens to identify potential brain and behavioral/socioemotional mediators of the association between PA and cognitive function. We first summarize what is known regarding cellular and molecular mechanisms, and then devote the remainder of the review to discussing evidence for brain systems and behavioral/socioemotional pathways by which PA influences cognition. It is our hope that discussing mechanisms at multiple levels of analysis will stimulate the field to examine both brain and behavioral mediators. Doing so is important, as it could lead to a more complete characterization of the processes by which PA influences neurocognitive function, as well as a greater variety of targets for modifying neurocognitive function in clinical contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 315 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 17%
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 84 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 18%
Neuroscience 42 13%
Sports and Recreations 38 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 108 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,418,973
of 25,211,948 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,128
of 7,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,562
of 432,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#31
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,211,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.