You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Association between Work-Related Rumination and Heart Rate Variability: A Field Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Cropley, David Plans, Davide Morelli, Stefan Sütterlin, Ilke Inceoglu, Geoff Thomas, Chris Chu |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study was to examine the association between perseverative cognition in the form of work-related rumination, and heart rate variability (HRV). We tested the hypothesis that high ruminators would show lower vagally mediated HRV relative to low ruminators during their leisure time. Individuals were classified as being low (n = 17) or high ruminators (n = 19), using the affective scale on the work-related rumination measure. HRV was assessed using a wrist sensor band (Microsoft Band 2). HRV was sampled between 8 pm and 10 pm over three workday evenings (Monday to Wednesday) while individuals carried out their normal evening routines. Compared to the low ruminators, high affective ruminators demonstrated lower HRV in the form of root mean square successive differences (RMSSDs), relative to the low ruminators, indicating lower parasympathetic activity. There was no significant difference in heart rate, or activity levels between the two groups during the recording periods. The current findings of this study may have implications for the design and delivery of interventions to help individuals unwind post work and to manage stress more effectively. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 27% |
| Germany | 4 | 15% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 298. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#115,726
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#61
of 7,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,779
of 432,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.