You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EEG-Neurofeedback as a Tool to Modulate Cognition and Behavior: A Review Tutorial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert, René J. Huster, Christoph S. Herrmann |
| Abstract |
Neurofeedback is attracting renewed interest as a method to self-regulate one's own brain activity to directly alter the underlying neural mechanisms of cognition and behavior. It not only promises new avenues as a method for cognitive enhancement in healthy subjects, but also as a therapeutic tool. In the current article, we present a review tutorial discussing key aspects relevant to the development of electroencephalography (EEG) neurofeedback studies. In addition, the putative mechanisms underlying neurofeedback learning are considered. We highlight both aspects relevant for the practical application of neurofeedback as well as rather theoretical considerations related to the development of new generation protocols. Important characteristics regarding the set-up of a neurofeedback protocol are outlined in a step-by-step way. All these practical and theoretical considerations are illustrated based on a protocol and results of a frontal-midline theta up-regulation training for the improvement of executive functions. Not least, assessment criteria for the validation of neurofeedback studies as well as general guidelines for the evaluation of training efficacy are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| France | 4 | 13% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 6% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 621 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 618 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 101 | 16% |
| Researcher | 80 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 73 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 14% |
| Unknown | 137 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 138 | 22% |
| Psychology | 130 | 21% |
| Engineering | 53 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 26 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 79 | 13% |
| Unknown | 177 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,645,323
of 24,562,945 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#771
of 7,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,281
of 315,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#24
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,562,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.