You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurofeedback of Slow Cortical Potentials in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Trial Controlling for Unspecific Effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00135 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ute Strehl, Pascal Aggensteiner, Daniel Wachtlin, Daniel Brandeis, Björn Albrecht, Maria Arana, Christiane Bach, Tobias Banaschewski, Thorsten Bogen, Andrea Flaig-Röhr, Christine M. Freitag, Yvonne Fuchsenberger, Stephanie Gest, Holger Gevensleben, Laura Herde, Sarah Hohmann, Tanja Legenbauer, Anna-Maria Marx, Sabina Millenet, Benjamin Pniewski, Aribert Rothenberger, Christian Ruckes, Sonja Wörz, Martin Holtmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 5 | 14% |
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 58% |
| Scientists | 9 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 170 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 65 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,372,328
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#630
of 7,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,568
of 326,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#20
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.