You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Commentary: Predictions and the brain: how musical sounds become rewarding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00168 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niels Chr. Hansen, Martin J. Dietz, Peter Vuust |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,890,513
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,354
of 7,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,503
of 325,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#39
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.