↓ Skip to main content

Imaging Brain Function with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Unconstrained Environments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging Brain Function with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Unconstrained Environments
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joana B. Balardin, Guilherme A. Zimeo Morais, Rogério A. Furucho, Lucas Trambaiolli, Patricia Vanzella, Claudinei Biazoli, João R. Sato

Abstract

Assessing the neural correlates of motor and cognitive processes under naturalistic experimentation is challenging due to the movement constraints of traditional brain imaging technologies. The recent advent of portable technologies that are less sensitive to motion artifacts such as Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) have been made possible the study of brain function in freely-moving participants. In this paper, we describe a series of proof-of-concept experiments examining the potential of fNIRS in assessing the neural correlates of cognitive and motor processes in unconstrained environments. We show illustrative applications for practicing a sport (i.e., table tennis), playing a musical instrument (i.e., piano and violin) alone or in duo and performing daily activities for many hours (i.e., continuous monitoring). Our results expand upon previous research on the feasibility and robustness of fNIRS to monitor brain hemodynamic changes in different real life settings. We believe that these preliminary results showing the flexibility and robustness of fNIRS measurements may contribute by inspiring future work in the field of applied neuroscience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Master 32 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 59 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 36 16%
Engineering 30 13%
Psychology 30 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Physics and Astronomy 8 3%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 72 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,939,849
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#948
of 7,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,386
of 313,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#31
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.