↓ Skip to main content

Improving EEG-Based Emotion Classification Using Conditional Transfer Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving EEG-Based Emotion Classification Using Conditional Transfer Learning
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00334
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan-Pin Lin, Tzyy-Ping Jung

Abstract

To overcome the individual differences, an accurate electroencephalogram (EEG)-based emotion-classification system requires a considerable amount of ecological calibration data for each individual, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Transfer learning (TL) has drawn increasing attention in the field of EEG signal mining in recent years. The TL leverages existing data collected from other people to build a model for a new individual with little calibration data. However, brute-force transfer to an individual (i.e., blindly leveraged the labeled data from others) may lead to a negative transfer that degrades performance rather than improving it. This study thus proposed a conditional TL (cTL) framework to facilitate a positive transfer (improving subject-specific performance without increasing the labeled data) for each individual. The cTL first assesses an individual's transferability for positive transfer and then selectively leverages the data from others with comparable feature spaces. The empirical results showed that among 26 individuals, the proposed cTL framework identified 16 and 14 transferable individuals who could benefit from the data from others for emotion valence and arousal classification, respectively. These transferable individuals could then leverage the data from 18 and 12 individuals who had similar EEG signatures to attain maximal TL improvements in valence- and arousal-classification accuracy. The cTL improved the overall classification performance of 26 individuals by ~15% for valence categorization and ~12% for arousal counterpart, as compared to their default performance based solely on the subject-specific data. This study evidently demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed cTL framework for improving an individual's default emotion-classification performance given a data repository. The cTL framework may shed light on the development of a robust emotion-classification model using fewer labeled subject-specific data toward a real-life affective brain-computer interface (ABCI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 20%
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 47 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 45 26%
Engineering 43 25%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 55 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,459,325
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,149
of 7,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,610
of 322,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#37
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.