↓ Skip to main content

A Meta-Analytic Study of the Neural Systems for Auditory Processing of Lexical Tones

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Meta-Analytic Study of the Neural Systems for Auditory Processing of Lexical Tones
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronica P. Y. Kwok, Guo Dan, Kofi Yakpo, Stephen Matthews, Peter T. Fox, Ping Li, Li-Hai Tan

Abstract

The neural systems of lexical tone processing have been studied for many years. However, previous findings have been mixed with regard to the hemispheric specialization for the perception of linguistic pitch patterns in native speakers of tonal language. In this study, we performed two activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analyses, one on neuroimaging studies of auditory processing of lexical tones in tonal languages (17 studies), and the other on auditory processing of lexical information in non-tonal languages as a control analysis for comparison (15 studies). The lexical tone ALE analysis showed significant brain activations in bilateral inferior prefrontal regions, bilateral superior temporal regions and the right caudate, while the control ALE analysis showed significant cortical activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus and left temporo-parietal regions. However, we failed to obtain significant differences from the contrast analysis between two auditory conditions, which might be caused by the limited number of studies available for comparison. Although the current study lacks evidence to argue for a lexical tone specific activation pattern, our results provide clues and directions for future investigations on this topic, more sophisticated methods are needed to explore this question in more depth as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 6 18%
Neuroscience 6 18%
Psychology 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,720,619
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,280
of 7,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,454
of 317,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#82
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.