↓ Skip to main content

Classifying Schizotypy Using an Audiovisual Emotion Perception Test and Scalp Electroencephalography

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classifying Schizotypy Using an Audiovisual Emotion Perception Test and Scalp Electroencephalography
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji Woon Jeong, Tariku W. Wendimagegn, Eunhee Chang, Yeseul Chun, Joon Hyuk Park, Hyoung Joong Kim, Hyun Taek Kim

Abstract

Schizotypy refers to the personality trait of experiencing "psychotic" symptoms and can be regarded as a predisposition of schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology (Raine, 1991). Cumulative evidence has revealed that individuals with schizotypy, as well as schizophrenia patients, have emotional processing deficits. In the present study, we investigated multimodal emotion perception in schizotypy and implemented the machine learning technique to find out whether a schizotypy group (ST) is distinguishable from a control group (NC), using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Forty-five subjects (30 ST and 15 NC) were divided into two groups based on their scores on a Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire. All participants performed an audiovisual emotion perception test while EEG was recorded. After the preprocessing stage, the discriminatory features were extracted using a mean subsampling technique. For an accurate estimation of covariance matrices, the shrinkage linear discriminant algorithm was used. The classification attained over 98% accuracy and zero rate of false-positive results. This method may have important clinical implications in discriminating those among the general population who have a subtle risk for schizotypy, requiring intervention in advance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 24 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 15%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Computer Science 4 8%
Engineering 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 30 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,477,045
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,286
of 7,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,422
of 316,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#101
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.