You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi-Modal Integration of EEG-fNIRS for Brain-Computer Interfaces – Current Limitations and Future Directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00503 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sangtae Ahn, Sung C. Jun |
| Abstract |
Multi-modal integration, which combines multiple neurophysiological signals, is gaining more attention for its potential to supplement single modality's drawbacks and yield reliable results by extracting complementary features. In particular, integration of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is cost-effective and portable, and therefore is a fascinating approach to brain-computer interface (BCI). However, outcomes from the integration of these two modalities have yielded only modest improvement in BCI performance because of the lack of approaches to integrate the two different features. In addition, mismatch of recording locations may hinder further improvement. In this literature review, we surveyed studies of the integration of EEG/fNIRS in BCI thoroughly and discussed its current limitations. We also suggested future directions for efficient and successful multi-modal integration of EEG/fNIRS in BCI systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Japan | 2 | 10% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| China | 1 | 5% |
| Croatia | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 47 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,364,452
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,095
of 7,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,143
of 333,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#23
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.