↓ Skip to main content

Objects Mental Rotation under 7 Days Simulated Weightlessness Condition: An ERP Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Objects Mental Rotation under 7 Days Simulated Weightlessness Condition: An ERP Study
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00553
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Wang, Jiaobo Duan, Yang Liao, Chuang Wang, Hongzheng Li, Xufeng Liu

Abstract

During the spaceflight under weightlessness condition, human's brain function may be affected by the changes of physiological effects along with the distribution of blood and body fluids to the head. This variation of brain function will influence the performance of astronauts and therefore create possible harm to flight safety. This study employs 20 male subjects in a 7-day-6° head-down tilted (HDT) bed rest model to simulate physiological effects under weightlessness condition, and use behavioral, electrophysiological techniques to compare the changes of mental rotation ability (MR ability) before and after short-term simulated weightlessness state. Behavioral results suggested that significant linear relationship existed between the rotation angle of stimuli and the reaction time, which means mental rotation process do happen during the MR task in simulated weightlessness state. In the first 3 days, the P300 component induced by object mental rotation followed the "down-up-down" pattern. In the following 4 days it changed randomly. On HDT D2, the mean of the amplitude of the P300 was the lowest, while increased gently on HDT D3. There was no obvious changing pattern of the amplitude of P300 observed after 3 days of HDT. Simulated weightlessness doesn't change the basic process of mental rotation. The effect of simulated weightlessness is neural mechanism of self-adaptation. MR ability didn't bounce back to the original level after HDT test.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,810,246
of 25,026,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,802
of 7,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,809
of 451,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#111
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,026,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.