You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sexual Abuse Exposure Alters Early Processing of Emotional Words: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00655 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Grégoire, Serge Caparos, Carole-Anne Leblanc, Benoit Brisson, Isabelle Blanchette |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to compare the time course of emotional information processing between trauma-exposed and control participants, using electrophysiological measures. We conceived an emotional Stroop task with two types of words: trauma-related emotional words and neutral words. We assessed the evoked cerebral responses of sexual abuse victims without post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and no abuse participants. We focused particularly on an early wave (C1/P1), the N2pc, and the P3b. Our main result indicated an early effect (55-165 ms) of emotionality, which varied between non-exposed participants and sexual abuse victims. This suggests that potentially traumatic experiences modulate early processing of emotional information. Our findings showing neurobiological alterations in sexual abuse victims (without PTSD) suggest that exposure to highly emotional events has an important impact on neurocognitive function even in the absence of psychopathology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Chile | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,144,681
of 24,072,790 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,538
of 7,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,343
of 481,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#34
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,072,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.