You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Powerful Statistical Inference for Nested Data Using Sufficient Summary Statistics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene Dowding, Stefan Haufe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 26% |
| Italy | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 8 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 19 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,192,121
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,001
of 7,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,983
of 352,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#19
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.