↓ Skip to main content

Neural Mechanisms Underlying Time Perception and Reward Anticipation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Time Perception and Reward Anticipation
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nihal Apaydın, Sertaç Üstün, Emre H. Kale, İpek Çelikağ, Halise D. Özgüven, Bora Baskak, Metehan Çiçek

Abstract

Findings suggest that the physiological mechanisms involved in the reward anticipation and time perception partially overlap. But the systematic investigation of a potential interaction between time and reward systems using neuroimaging is lacking. Eighteen healthy volunteers (all right-handed) participated in an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment that employs a visual paradigm that consists monetary reward to assess whether the functional neural representations of time perception and reward prospection are shared or distinct. Subjects performed a time perception task in which observers had to extrapolate the velocity of an occluded moving object in "reward" vs. "no-reward" sessions during fMRI scanning. There were also "control condition" trials in which participants judged about the color tone change of the stimuli. Time perception showed a fronto-parietal (more extensive in the right) cingulate and peristriate cortical as well as cerebellar activity. On the other hand, reward anticipation activated anterior insular cortex, nucleus accumbens, caudate nucleus, thalamus, cerebellum, postcentral gyrus, and peristriate cortex. Interaction between the time perception and the reward prospect showed dorsolateral, orbitofrontal, medial prefrontal and caudate nucleus activity. Our findings suggest that a prefrontal-striatal circuit might integrate reward and timing systems of the brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 32%
Psychology 16 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,722,901
of 25,349,035 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,278
of 7,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,119
of 338,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#30
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.