↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Multichannel EEG Patterns During Human Sleep: A Novel Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Multichannel EEG Patterns During Human Sleep: A Novel Approach
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Krauss, Achim Schilling, Judith Bauer, Konstantin Tziridis, Claus Metzner, Holger Schulze, Maximilian Traxdorf

Abstract

Classic visual sleep stage scoring is based on electroencephalogram (EEG) frequency band analysis of 30 s epochs and is commonly performed by highly trained medical sleep specialists using additional information from submental EMG and eye movements electrooculogram (EOG). In this study, we provide the proof-of-principle in 40 subjects that sleep stages can be consistently differentiated solely on the basis of spatial 3-channel EEG patterns based on root-mean-square (RMS) amplitudes. The polysomnographic 3-channel EEG data are pre-processed by RMS averaging over intervals of 30 s leading to spatial cortical activity patterns represented by 3-dimensional vectors. These patterns are visualized using multidimensional scaling (MDS), allowing a comparison of the spatial cortical activity patterns with the conventional visual sleep scoring system according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM). Spatial cortical activity patterns based on RMS amplitudes naturally divide into different clusters that correspond to visually scored sleep stages. Furthermore, these clusters are reproducible between different subjects. Especially the cluster associated with the REM sleep stage seems to be very different from the one associated with the wake state. This study provides a proof-of-principle that it is possible to separate sleep stages solely by analyzing spatially distributed EEG RMS amplitudes reflecting cortical activity and without classical EEG feature extractions like power spectrum analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 16%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Engineering 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Psychology 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,615,900
of 24,633,436 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,038
of 7,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,044
of 334,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#51
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,633,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.