↓ Skip to main content

Voluntary Movement Takes Shape: The Link Between Movement Focusing and Sensory Input Gating

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Voluntary Movement Takes Shape: The Link Between Movement Focusing and Sensory Input Gating
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Belvisi, Antonella Conte, Francesca Natalia Cortese, Matteo Tartaglia, Nicoletta Manzo, Pietro Li Voti, Antonio Suppa, Alfredo Berardelli

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between motor surround inhibition (mSI) and the modulation of somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold (STDT) induced by voluntary movement. Seventeen healthy volunteers participated in the study. To assess mSI, we delivered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) single pulses to record motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the right abductor digiti minimi (ADM; "surround muscle") during brief right little finger flexion. mSI was expressed as the ratio of ADM MEP amplitude during movement to MEP amplitude at rest. We preliminarily measured STDT values by assessing the shortest interval at which subjects were able to recognize a pair of electric stimuli, delivered over the volar surface of the right little finger, as separate in time. We then evaluated the STDT by using the same motor task used for mSI. mSI and STDT modulation were evaluated at the same time points during movement. mSI and STDT modulation displayed similar time-dependent changes during index finger movement. In both cases, the modulation was maximally present at the onset of the movement and gradually vanished over about 200 ms. Our study provides the first neurophysiological evidence about the relationship between mSI and tactile-motor integration during movement execution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 24%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Psychology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,648,325
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,108
of 7,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,076
of 333,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#102
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.