↓ Skip to main content

A 12-Week Cycling Training Regimen Improves Upper Limb Functions in People With Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 12-Week Cycling Training Regimen Improves Upper Limb Functions in People With Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Nadeau, Ovidiu Lungu, Arnaud Boré, Réjean Plamondon, Catherine Duchesne, Marie-Ève Robillard, Florian Bobeuf, Anne-Louise Lafontaine, Freja Gheysen, Louis Bherer, Julien Doyon

Abstract

Background: It has been proposed that physical exercise can help improve upper limb functions in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients; yet evidence for this hypothesis is limited. Objective: To assess the effects of aerobic exercise training (AET) on general upper limb functions in sedentary people with PD and healthy adults (HA). Methods: Two groups, 19 PD patients (Hoehn & Yahr ≤ 2) and 20 HA, matched on age and sedentary level, followed a 3-month stationary bicycle AET regimen. We used the kinematic theory framework to characterize and quantify the different motor control commands involved in performing simple upper-limb movements as drawing lines. Repeated measures ANCOVA models were used to assess the effect of AET in each group, as well as the difference between groups following the training regimen. Results: At baseline, PD individuals had a larger antagonist response, a longer elapsed time between the visual stimulus and the end of the movement, and a longer time of displacement of the stylus than the HA. Following the 12-week AET, PD participants showed significant decreases of the agonist and antagonist commands, as well as the antagonist response spread. A significant group ∗ session interaction effect was observed for the agonist command and the response spread of the antagonist command, suggesting a significant change for these two parameters only in PD patients following the AET. Among the differences observed at baseline, only the difference for the time of movement remained after AET. Conclusion: A 3-month AET has a significant positive impact on the capacity to draw lines in a more efficiency way, in PD patients, indicating an improvement in the upper limb motor function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 36 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Neuroscience 9 11%
Sports and Recreations 7 8%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 38 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,518,671
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,228
of 7,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,609
of 337,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#58
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.