You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Insights About the Neuroplasticity State on the Effect of Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation in Pain and Disability Associated With Chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS): A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00388 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leonardo Botelho, Letícia Angoleri, Maxciel Zortea, Alicia Deitos, Aline Brietzke, Iraci L. S. Torres, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 18% |
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,046,500
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,684
of 7,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,722
of 360,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#33
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.