↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation on Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical and Neurophysiological Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation on Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical and Neurophysiological Assessment
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliana Berra, Roberto Bergamaschi, Roberto De Icco, Carlotta Dagna, Armando Perrotta, Marco Rovaris, Maria Grazia Grasso, Maria G. Anastasio, Giovanna Pinardi, Federico Martello, Stefano Tamburin, Giorgio Sandrini, Cristina Tassorelli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 28 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Unspecified 6 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 33 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,915,021
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,076
of 7,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,131
of 460,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#64
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.