↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Higher integrity of the motor and visual pathways in long-term video game players

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Higher integrity of the motor and visual pathways in long-term video game players
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Zhang, Guijin Du, Yongxin Yang, Wen Qin, Xiaodong Li, Quan Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,679,530
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,112
of 7,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,034
of 352,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#79
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.